Reduce enrollment delays before they impact trial timelines
Reduce preventable screen failures, improve enrollment predictability, and support audit-ready eligibility workflows — without replacing clinical coordinators.
Designed for sponsors, CROs, and trial sites. Human-in-the-loop by design.
Enrollment delays are expensive
Enrollment targets slip and activation plans become harder to manage.
Teams spend time on repetitive review, follow-up, and documentation.
Trial execution becomes harder to forecast across sites and cohorts.
Inconsistent rationale and communication records increase operational exposure.
A workflow support layer for clinical operations teams
Designed for human-in-the-loop review, audit-ready documentation, existing EHR and site workflows, and complex chronic disease trial criteria.
Clinical teams remain the final decision-makers.
Reduce preventable screen failures
Flag potential eligibility mismatches earlier in the enrollment workflow.
Improve enrollment predictability
Support more reliable forecasting across enrollment milestones and site activation timelines.
Reduce coordinator administrative burden
Decrease repetitive manual eligibility review and documentation tasks.
Support audit and compliance workflows
Maintain structured eligibility rationale and communication records for QA and IRB processes.
Built for modern clinical trial operations
Improve visibility into enrollment risk and trial execution variability.
Reduce operational friction and support more efficient site management.
Help coordinators manage eligibility workflows without adding another disconnected system.
We're currently speaking with
to validate workflows for AI-assisted eligibility review and enrollment risk reduction.
If enrollment delays and screen failures are active challenges in your trials, we'd like to learn from your team.
Request Early Access
See how AI-assisted eligibility review may help reduce enrollment delays and improve operational predictability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the platform replace clinical coordinators?
No. The system is designed to support clinical teams, not replace human decision-making.
Is this connected to EHR systems?
We are exploring integrations that fit existing clinical workflows and reduce administrative burden.
Is the platform making autonomous eligibility decisions?
No. Clinical teams remain responsible for final eligibility determination and oversight.
Who is this designed for?
Sponsors, CROs, and trial sites managing complex Phase I–III clinical trials.
Reduce delays. Improve predictability.
Request early access to explore how AI-assisted eligibility review can help your team reduce preventable screen failures and support more reliable trial operations.